Historiography: An Analysis of How History is Written and Interpreted

Authors

  • Dr. A. K. Mohanti NIILM University, Kaithal, Haryana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64429/

Keywords:

Historiography, Historical Interpretation, Positivism, Marxist Historiography, Subaltern Studies, Feminist Historiography

Abstract

Historiography refers to the study of how history is written, interpreted, and constructed by historians across different periods. It goes beyond the simple recording of past events and focuses on the methods, perspectives, and ideological frameworks that shape historical narratives. This paper examines the evolution of historiography from ancient narrative traditions to modern scientific approaches and postmodern critiques, highlighting how the understanding and interpretation of history have transformed over time. It also discusses major schools of historiography, including positivist, Marxist, subaltern, and feminist perspectives, each of which offers a distinct framework for analyzing the past and emphasizes different aspects of historical reality. Furthermore, the study explores key factors that influence historical interpretation, such as bias, culture, political ideology, and the availability and limitations of sources. Through selected case studies like the Revolt of 1857, the French Revolution, World War I, and the Industrial Revolution, the paper demonstrates how the same historical events can generate multiple and often conflicting interpretations. Overall, this research emphasizes that history is not a fixed or absolute truth but a dynamic and continuously evolving process of interpretation shaped by context, perspective, and methodological choices of historians.

Author Biography

  • Dr. A. K. Mohanti, NIILM University, Kaithal, Haryana

    Ph.D. in History

Downloads

Published

10.04.2026

How to Cite

Dr. Anonya Krishna Mohanti. (2026). Historiography: An Analysis of How History is Written and Interpreted. Wisdom Vortex: International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.64429/